We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Quack?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
PublicPeople is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At PublicPeople, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A quack is someone who offers medical treatment or advice without the qualifications to do so. As a general rule, quack is a derogatory term, and an accusation of quackery can result in serious punishments, as the unlicensed practice of medicine is punished very severely in most countries. The term “quack” is also used more generally to refer to someone who lacks scientific qualifications but speaks about scientific issues anyway.

The word “quack” is a shortening of “quacksalver,” a Middle English word which was used to describe people who sold various nostrums and other products at fairs and markets. Typically, quacksalvers announced their wares in penetrating, loud voices, making a variety of exuberant claims to attract customers, so one can see how the word evolved to refer to an unlicensed practitioner of medicine. “Quacksalver,” incidentally, comes from a Dutch word which means “boasting.”

Quackery is probably as old as the practice of medicine itself, although it rose to new levels in the 18th and 19th centuries, when an explosion of patent medicines plagued many countries in Europe and the United States. Many people saw the potential for turning a quick profit, and turned to sales of patent medicines and the dispensation of medical advice as a way to make a living. In the late 19th century, some attempt at regulation started to emerge, and today quackery is treated as a crime, typically prosecuted as health fraud.

Some very notable physicians were accused of being quacks in their day; Louis Pasteur, for example, was laughed at and called a quack for proposing that food could be sterilized with the application of heat, although pasteurization is an accepted and widely used practice today. In these instances, accusations of quackery were the result of radical ideas or an improper understanding of a concept.

There is some dispute about the boundaries of quackery. Some practitioners of allopathic medicine, for example, consider alternative and complementary medical practitioners to be quacks, railing against treatments ranging from acupuncture to the use of magnets in medical therapy. Many of these accusations stem from legitimate concerns about the efficacy of treatments, based on poor performance in empirical testing.

Due to concerns about quackery, all forms of health care are carefully monitored for advertising and claims which could be considered misleading, and only someone with a medical degree can dispense medical advice, prescriptions, and information. For this reason, many people who practice alternative medicine are severely limited; a massage therapist can work on strained muscles, for example, but he or she cannot legally offer medical advice such as nutritional recommendations to the client.

PublicPeople is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a PublicPeople researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments
By anon183922 — On Jun 06, 2011

I think one distinction between a "quack" and a homeopathic practitioner is belief in the products he or she recommends. A person can honestly believe a certain herbal concoction, like St. John's Wort for depression, does what it says it will do. A quack knows ahead of time that the product or procedure he or she is promoting is a scam or completely ineffective.

It may be proven later that a homeopathic remedy is not effective, but the intention was to offer an alternative to traditional medicine, not to separate someone from his or her money.

By anon175801 — On May 13, 2011

Making nutritional suggestions is not the same as giving "medical" advice. This is particularly true in light of the fact that medical doctors have little, if any, nutritional training in the first place. So who is the quack?

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.