We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who are Sacco and Vanzetti?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
PublicPeople is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At PublicPeople, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Sacco and Vanzetti were two Italian men who were tried and convicted in 1921 for a dual murder which took place in 1920. Later evidence suggested that the men were actually falsely accused, and the case attracted a great deal of attention in the 1920s. Unfortunately, the two men were executed before they could be exonerated, despite extensive public outcry. The Sacco and Vanzetti case was historically important in the United States for a number of reasons, and it continues to be widely discussed and cited today.

Ferdinando Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were both workmen, and they were involved in the anarchist community of the 1920s. Critics of the case have suggested that the men were probably framed because of their association with prominent Italian anarchists of the time. In the 1920s, many Americans were concerned about Italian anarchists and the threat of bombings and other acts of violence, and this fear was used to great advantage by the prosecution in the Sacco and Vanzetti trial; the jury only deliberated for three hours, despite the fact that the evidence was far from perfect.

The crime that the two men were charged with was an armed robbery which turned bad. On 15 April 1920, two employees of the Slater-Morrill Shoe Company were traveling with around $17,000 US Dollars in South Braintree, Massachusetts. The two men were interrupted by armed robbers along their way; the robbers shot them, stole the cash, and escaped with three other men in a car which was believed to have been stolen. The two victims of the attack later died, and witnesses indicated that the robbers were Italian; Sacco and Vanzetti were unfortunate enough to fall into a police trap which implicated them in the crime.

The two men were tried for the murder in 1921, after Vanzetti was tried and convicted for the robbery in 1920. Through the trial, many prominent Americans spoke out about what they saw as a frameup, and when the jury returned a verdict of guilty, riots and demonstrations for the cause were held all over the world. After a series of failed appeals, the men were executed by electrocution in 1927; great public outcry also accompanied their execution.

Legal historians widely believe that the justice system failed Sacco and Vanzetti, and that the case illustrated prejudice against members of the anarchist community. For anarchist historians, the Sacco and Vanzetti case is very important historically, because many mainstream Americans reacted with disbelief to the case and its outcome, suggesting that the anarchist cause may have had sympathy in surprising places during the 1920s. The case continues to be explored and rehashed in films and books, many of which are by prominent historians, authors, and filmmakers.

PublicPeople is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a PublicPeople researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments
By anon321845 — On Feb 24, 2013

Somewhat recent evidence shows that Sacco and Vanzetti were, in fact, guilty. Upton Sinclair, who zealously defended them, confessed in a letter that he had suspicions that they actually committed the crimes. Look it up.

By anon245926 — On Feb 07, 2012

I think it was sacco who did it.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.