We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who Were the Chicago Eight?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
PublicPeople is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At PublicPeople, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Chicago Eight were a group of individuals indicted for conspiracy, inciting to riot, and several other charges related to the riots which took place at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The trial of the Chicago Eight in 1969 attracted national attention, and proved to be the first test of the rioting provisions in the 1968 Civil Rights Act. In addition to the eight protesters brought to trial, eight police officers were also indicted on charges pertaining to the riots.

The 1968 Democratic National Convention was marked by violent protests which devolved into rioting. Police and demonstrators alike participated in the rioting, making the city a very dangerous place to be. In the wake of the riots, a grand jury was convened to determine who was responsible, and the jury moved to indict the Chicago Eight and the eight policemen, formally bringing them into court in March 1969, with the trial starting in September of that same year.

The eight men involved in the trial were Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Lee Weiner, John Froines, Rennie Davis, and Bobbie Seale. The trial of the Chicago Eight was accompanied with massive protests outside the courtroom, leading the City of Chicago to request assistance from the National Guard. In the courtroom, the men displayed great contempt for the court, sneering at the judge and jury, appearing dressed in judicial robes, and generally behaving poorly, as far as typical courtroom behavior goes. Bobbie Seale was so contemptuous that the judge severed him from the trial, sentencing him to five years in prison for contempt of court and turning the Chicago Eight into the Chicago Seven.

At the conclusion of the trial in 1970, two of the men, John Froines and Lee Weiner, were acquitted altogether. The other five were acquitted of conspiracy, but convicted of crossing state lines to incite a riot, and sentenced to prison. In 1972, the United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the convictions, arguing that the defense lawyers, Leonard Weinglass and William Kunstler, were not allowed to fully screen jurors, meaning that jurors with clear bias were admitted to the trial.

Of the eight policeman, the charges against one of the officers were dropped, and the other seven were acquitted. The disparity in treatment of the civilians and police officers was often criticized, with protesters suggesting that the officers should have been convicted and subjected to punishment for their role in the rioting.

PublicPeople is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a PublicPeople researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By anon22868 — On Dec 11, 2008

The defendants' actions were indeed contemptuous, however, they were responding to a situation in which the judge, who is supposed to remain the impartial adjudicator of the law, was clearly in favor of the prosecution. Bobby Seale's actions, more than any of the defendants, were justified because of the judge's bias. It was due to the judge's rulings that the trial would not be postponed so Seale's lawyer could recover from surgery. It was due to the judge's rulings that Seale was not allowed to represent himself, in violation of Seale's constitutional rights. Before classifying someone's actions as poor, one needs to examine the motives for their actions.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

PublicPeople, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.